Islamabad-Mili-Tarry Courts and Arcticle were under Article 175, the Supreme Court was interrogated on Wednesday.
Seven-member bench (ICA) led by Justice Amin-din Khan’s seven-member Bench (ICA) led by Justice Amin-din Khan.
Justice Mughat Hillaley asked Justice Music Haris from the annexation of the high courts, which was implemented in the high courts. They asked the military court and Article 175 (3) or these different.
Justice Jamal Khan questioned any forum to avoid falling under Article 175, but it is installed for the trial of the Armed Forces. He said the court was attracted to an observation in the 1973 Article 6 (3) (A) (A). Article 6 (3) (3) in 1973 (3) (3) (3)
Justice Mohammed Ali Mashr, which would create more complications, would not create more complications that FB Ali is not contributed before the Constitutional Bench.
Justice Amin said the Supreme Court has great authority to declare that military courts could not be tried.
When a person is subject to military action, KH Harris argued that the KH Harris argued that once a person becomes the issue of the Army. He said the duties of the armed forces not only did the maintenance of discipline but also to prevent others intervene in creating their duties. If a person does a guilt, he tried Mi-Tary courts to be subjected to Act.
Kk Haris says court resources (2) (D)) is based on the basis of basic rights. He said that if military courts conducted not violated the fundamental rights of the common people. He said, “He said,” He said, “He said,” He then said to talk about the fundamental rights.
Later, the bench hearing the bench heard to the day.
