The entrance system to the major courts of all four judges is believed to be discriminated. The study of the study of the role of the successful discretion of the successful discretion, the interviews of the report of the winners.
On the other hand, the privileges of senior judicial positions and the presidents of the Supreme Court, the presidents of the national court, and their rooms and province hearing will be discriminated by Sector.
The statutes that control them are “merits” or a particular jurisdiction in conference;
The study argues that women understand that when the appointments are not transmitted because the appointments are not transparent, women understand, “they feel safe against discriminatory decisions.” At this time, in the equality conditions indicates the lack of discernment in equality circumstances, although all qualities come together, although all the qualities are gathered, their magneticists have been discouraged to the highest positions of the race.
Therefore, though the respondents agree that there are internal obstacles, the main reason for the main reason for the main reason for visiting the selection processes is considered. Working Overload is awarded in the position of more than 65% of the people. The approach is an obstacle to more than half of these people and the jobs related to this kind of charges.
On the explanation date of study, 64.4 percent of judges and magistrants were meant in a single limb. According to him, these are generally, in general, giving minimum level of facilities to compare the worst, work and family life. There are 74.3% of the participants and half of them (49%) and daughters under about 12 years. One-third is assumed that the older care jobs will be used useful for future promotion.
In the survey, in a six, six, in a six, the potential (43.8%) or responsible for reconciliation (43.8%) or rectangled. Less than 19.7%, the remaining 14.23%, nothing. Lack of selfless lack of selfdia imstorm Syndrome – a large magistrate, not a barrier for judges.
Gender
Since women are integrated into the judiciary, the gender gap is explained because of the structure of judicial system. That is, women’s presence in these positions are justified because the seniority of the rules does not meet the requirements. However, this report is emphasized to emphasize the data that it is not the cause of explaining the difference. ”
Only 22% of the total women participating in the selected candidates, only 22% of these procedures are accessed. For men, high success rate: 35.59% of those who appear in the selection call are available. Additionally, the study points out that their classmates occupy the same position once their classmates once. It is more common to replace them immediately. That is, they play low in comparison with men.
How to favor the Logs of women to discerning positions, 80% of the survey and magistrants. Therefore, 98.9% agrees to improve the transparency and precious norms of the selection process. It is to be published to think of ten in ten, “95%) and the more linked norms (90.3%) and they advise to develop favorable steps.
Between 2024 December 2023 and September 2023, Public Sector Women’s Association: A documentary made by a statistical analysis of the research context; A profitary attribute to identifying obstacles to women’s entry to discerned positions; A survey of Spain for Judges and the Magistuts prepareded a survey. The statistical data used for study is 2023.
