The provincial court of Los Palmas dismissed the appeal filed by Real Madrid football player Raul Asenzio One of the four soldiers who were investigated in the case of spreading Sexual content with a child under 16. Confirms the decision of the resolution An instruction court in the south of Grania KanariaIt ordered the identification of participants in the courier groups, where the material may have been shared, as well as quoted them to declare or investigate as witnesses. In their car released on January 28, three magistrates say that Canary Cenarian Cantono may have committed “rational signs” of finding another secrets in children’s pornographic images.
The trial began on September 18, 2023 Following the complaint of the young woman’s mother at the headquarters headquarters in the north of Grania, it accused the child of spreading a video of transparent sexual content. It was recorded on June 15. As described by the woman, in the municipality of Mogan, those reserved relationships reserved for the famous local leisure time of the city of Amadorce were spoiled. Not so, this was carried out without knowing about young women. In September of the same year, the instruction judge accused four players. Since then, Crankanario football player – 22 years old on the 13th – He settled as the head of the team led by Carlo Anselotti. The rest are investigated by Catalan Feron Ruis (struggling in Jiranna), Calisian Juan Rodriguez (CD Tarasona) and Balleric Andres Garcia (Alkorgan).
The security of Asenzio presented many arguments. He argued that the proceedings of the trial judge were simply the future, that is, that they were being carried out with the intention of seeking evidence without the concrete signs of crime and indiscriminately looking for evidence. In addition, it emphasized the absence of video in the investigation, and if the video was not recovered by the judiciary police, it would not be recognized by its existence or its content, and finally, there was insufficient sources.
The judges of the investigation point to these arguments and impose those who have been investigated to accept the practical beaches: they underline that the actions that have been agreed before expiring are ordered, so they are valid. Although the data analysis is carried out after the expiration, the Supreme Court’s judicial department establishes that it is not valid, and in addition, they argue that nothing prevents the opening of a separate piece, which will appear new investigation lines, which will allow you to extend the deadline if necessary.
Security argued that there was no criminal evidence because the video was not recovered. The car makes it clear that the lack of video file is not the same as it never existed, and it establishes that the crime has been accomplished at the time of the video shared, regardless of whether it was destroyed later. In addition, they remember that there is a report by someone who is investigated, and Asnsio showed him the video, indicating that he received it on WhatsApp with mobile records. Keep in mind that magistrates, finally, can be rebuilt from witnesses and obtained digital tests.
The analysis of mobile phones seized during the instructions during the instruction revealed compromise conversations that strengthen the signs of him. In data exaggerations, news was found, commenting on investigations and concerned about legal consequences. One of those involved was looking for information about the offense of spreading close images without permission, which suggests that he was aware of the severity of the facts and potential criminal impacts.
Moreover, in the interventioned conversations, the three comments inquired made the boy who had filed a complaint, which added a bad organ to the case.
