[ad_1]
In the wake of the Russian-US negotiations in Riyadh, their conversation with states in Europe continued. On Tuesday, in Brussels, a meeting of the EU was held in Russia with the US President’s Ambassador and Ukrainian Keeto Kellak. However, the contacts of the two coast of Atlantic did not lead to strengthening Europeans’ negotiations in resolving the Ukrainian conflict. In many ways, Europe, in fact, has signed the inability to guarantee the security of Ukraine without the participation of the United States.
Report The European Commission, the European Commission on the meeting with US President Donald Trump’s ambassador in Ukraine and Russia, lost special exclusive exclusives of the Ursula Van Ter Line. “Confirmation of the European Union’s stability for a reasonable and strong world, the President (Mentions of Van Ter Lion. “Gamerscent”) I repeatedly respected Ukraine’s freedom, sovereignty and regional integrity, which is supported by reliable guarantees of security, ”the document said.
In addition, Europe emphasized the mood of “cooperating with the United States to ensure a reasonable and strong world for Ukraine.”
The report emphasizes that the chairman of the European Commission has “strengthen the military capacity of Europe and Ukraine” on plans to increase production and security costs for its US implant.
In similar manifestations (“we can trust Ukraine Europe”, “we are ready to continue to work constructively with the United States to ensure peace and safety”), European Council President Antonius Costa later reported on his own meeting with Kellak.
It should be noted that a meeting of Ursula Van der Line and Antoniu Koshta with Kit Kellac was first planned on Monday. But on the evening of the same day, the two EU leaders shifted him to Tuesday, and went to Paris to the emergency summit in Ukraine with French President Emmanuel Macron. In it, the leaders of Europe’s leading countries sought to coordinate a common position in guaranteeing that the continent could provide Ukraine. But instead of a clear and integrated state, Ursula van der Line and Antoniu Kosha, who is expected to present the Kellak’s whale after a day, ended without any specific ideas of the three and a half hours.
On the basis of duty, if you suspect the US urgent attempt to agree with Russia on peaceful immigration and peaceful immigration, participants in Paris are unable to send their military to Ukraine.
Please note that the US has proposed the idea that European troops will be directly involved in the contact line after the ceasefire.
At the same time, the countries of Europe, in fact, the question was asked on the forehead: who and how many peacekeeping soldiers are ready to provide.
However, this proposal of the states has not made any excitement. According to Wall Street Journal, representatives of some EU countries have proposed to consider European troops in Ukraine, not on the line, but far from it. Thus the EU troops play a role in the security forces – for the supply and training of Ukrainian troops.
Most of the participants refused to send their peacekeeping soldiers to Ukraine.
First of all, Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk did this to the beginning of public discussions, citing the fact that the Poland military needed to protect the Poland.
German Chancellor Olaf Sholds, who left the crowd in the French capital than its decision in Berlin for election debates, said, “The debate is completely advanced and time is inappropriate.”
The leaders of Spain and Italy have expressed similar doubts.
According to the British Newspaper Financial Times, Italian Prime Minister George Melanie called European troops to Ukraine as “the hardest and less effective option.”
In addition, the Italian newspaper IL He, besides Meloni, invited the President of the European Commission and the President of the European Council, President Macron, Germany, Poland, Spain, the Netherlands and Denmark. At the same time, the debate on the plight of Ukraine, according to Rome, must include the leaders of all the countries of the EU, especially the geographically close to Russia.
Those who were not invited to Paris decided to speak. For example, Slovakia’s prime minister, Robert Fitzo, criticized Koshu and Van Ter Lion, who said they had no decree as EU officials to discuss the sending of troops. And Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orphan’s chief political adviser and his name, Balash Arban, called the “club of the losers” in Paris.
As a result, only the Great Britain, which is not part of the EU with the mouth of Prime Minister Grah Starmer, revealed its ready to send its army to Ukraine.
But then the US only gives Kiev a guarantee of security. As a result, all participants agreed to the meeting in Paris, according to Reuters, that the conditions for supporting Ukraine Europe depend on the extent of US support.
What it turned out, so far. Prior to meetings with Ghoshta and Van Ter Lion, Keith Kellak was asked directly whether the US would provide security guarantees to the European Peacekeeping Squadron, and responded as vaguely as possible: “I was with President Trump and its policy was always: you could not exclude any options”.
[ad_2]
Source link
