Constitution Ambaro is a municipal police, unsafe after denouncing irregularities | Spain

The Constitutional Court has given Ambaro to a municipal police Deorevija . The Basic Law guarantees that this situation of the complainant’s foolishness is violating his right to physical and moral integrity recognized in Article 15 of the Constitution and that he does not obtain the safety of the jurisdiction.

Maria Louisa Segoviano, a progressive department of the court, explained that some of the comrades of Torevija’s municipal police have condemned the appeal of the money and selected research at the leisure premises. ” The verdict argues that the injury of the complainant’s aforementioned rights was responsible for the Torevija city and the High Court of Valencian community.

In the first case, violating the rights of the city council of Aligande is considered to be done by the behavior of the Constor, which is the “preventing, investigating and permitting” activities of “harassing and harassing its public servants.” The Constitution estimates that the appeal was issued, which “the judiciary on these rights Violating control, the guaranteed organization said that the judiciary was not properly used.

To achieve these results, the first room of the Constitution withdrew from the proven facts of the previous judicial path. In this process, it was recognized that the case began with the plaintiff’s criminal complaint against some members of the local police. It was later discovered that “their person (from the complainant) had a continuous and a series of labor interests played by their peers or more.” Among the people who had done these behavior, among others, the agents he denounced, and “local administration was in the use of their powers”.

The court emphasizes that “the city council has repeatedly had the harassment of the local police.” These measures, in a nutshell, recorded “sued” and municipal authorities recorded “these behaviors related to the plaintiff’s physical and mental health.” The Constitution finally states that before these symptoms, “the need to react to the Constarity”, “his performance proves alienation to any bad purpose, which is not verified.”

As a result of the punishment, the city council must compensate for the police, although the Constitutional verdict refers to the controversial-order room of the Valencian community’s High Court to establish that amount.