– American retreat expected for a long time. For decades, have been declared to do it by subsequent American presidents. Today, the most important question is decreased to a significant: This is a retreating with Europeans, or is one of the best of theores in the world.
At first glance, the most important sign of the US presence in Europe is the horizontal army. It will be 80,000 soldiers, if the soldiers and hostile invasion will be 300,000.
But not so. NATO was built with a dominant exclusively, and intentionally depends on the American leadership. – The United States can be a pillar of an alliance, and maintain our allies and push them to do what we want. If this is more clearly, the US army is a skeleton of NATO, so that the body will die, exhibits how the theory is to be strengthened.
Controlling the United States to the current NATO command structure. This command is better to rely on the forces in Europe in the American command, and the US soldiers leave the command after US soldiers left Europe. – I don’t think the NATO in Europe is able to work without our commanders and staff. This will be extremely difficult – the US Divis, one of the commanders of NATO, says Davis.
– The United States is very widely believed to replace all that we lost, we will take over a decade. Surely, consider what Europe do. This is not completely clear, in terms of previous shameful neglect, is not completely clear – says a skilled sculpture and the counselor of the British government.
There is no europe defenses. He traveled the soldiers well, but there is no need to perform a long conflict and firepers to make your own lush. “To prevent the imaginary Russian attack in the Baltic states, the European Army requires 1,400 tanks and a world of 2,000 desirability. – We have not invested in the military.
There is no advanced weapon of Europe, which distributes the united states. – Main contrast, Missile Defense, Missile Shells, Missile Shells, Long-Files, Advanced Draws, Advanced Draws, Advanced Draws, Advanced Draws, and Intelligence.
About 100% for Europe depending on the American satellite intelligence. This backlogs will remain moving, very expensive – In most cases, it exceeds personal countries skills. Without without defeating Russia in the traditional battle, but the cost is very high. – It doesn’t mean that it can’t do anything but it will get better. As a result, more bloody blooms, more blooming, more losses in the Egmont of International Relations in Brussels.
The easiest way to find money
2000 r. Russian defense expenses 360% increased (after reducing inflation), China – 596% of the US is the highest rate in the world. Europe was an exception to the year 2015, because its military expenses were reduced or the same condition. After 2015, they increased a little, and the Putin attacked only a full rate of only 2022. This means 50% increase in 25 years.
Finding money is easy for everything. Instead of Ukraine instead of their own strengthening and American assistance. Since February 2022, US military support for Kiev was $ 62 billion US $ 62 billion. To complete the hole around the USA, the European Union GDP will spend 3 mills of GDP.
The loss is more difficult to lose without signing into American military-industrial bases. 63% of Europe military purchases are in companies in addition to the European Union, mainly American. It requires much coordination to invest in and make more purchases. – Developing new arms mechanisms is very expensive. Most countries cannot be alone. The good idea is to be integrated into the forces – radczenko emphasis.
Now these are 27 Special Armed Forces and 27 Ordering Institutions. That is why Europeans have 17 different types of tanks – the United States is one. 20 types of fighting aircraft. – We need public standards, money, scaling and productive processes – the former chief of the German company Renki is a former chief of Renganna.
Another problem is to find those who want to fight. For example, despite the latest attempts of the German military, it takes Rs 20,000 to achieve a low readiness. Soldiers. Almost all European countries have this problem. Military salary is relatively lowIt is difficult to maintain qualified soldiers. In the labor market, the armed forces compete with the private sector, but in very adverse event.
– Lower quality of life, resting and missions, exemption rings, exemptions and abroad, uncertainty and death is likely, you will have to pay the high salaries of the soldiers. As they are tall, young younger younger younger younger Europeans like to work in civil sector. As a result, most European armies are “in panic mode, trying to face an increased threat from Moscow – politician Vinsco Bow is emphasizing. In many countries in Western Europe, the Cold War declined to half in the end of the Cold War – more than 300,000 people in 1989. It will become very difficult, because the popula is shrinking.
The minimal Army’s myth
The idea of Soviet threat was constantly discussed from the first days of the Cold War. Even the Present Icehower moved European leaders to approve a public army comprising Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands and Germany. In 1952, these countries ended in 1952, but the French parliament was not approved in 1954 and was afraid to lose national sovereignty.
Since then The idea of a public army She returned several times but usually for a short period of time. Today he comes again. In terms of unpredictable struggle from Russia, the European Union president in Ukraine president of drones and artificial intelligence in Ukraine president.
There is good reasons for a common army of a common army in a glance. Europe’s defense is insufficient. When performing joint purchases, we will get more for the same money. The creation of a European army and a strong political signal will be the best step to union.
However, this suggestion is unlikely to implement. Table “But long time. As in 1954, the French is always successful – As the French is said” No “, Brestes intends to create a joint army).
It is not known who is commanding such an army. The European Union will need long and tiring change in the past, today the resistance of the area will be defined as liability. What happens if there is no avity? If a group of countries like to distribute the branches of this army at home, don’t need it to another group? Some EU countries – Austria, Ireland, Malta – their neutrality could not participate in the European military. Distance for the EU NO EU NO EU NO EUNITE, Was the theory of Great Britain or the theory?
A few years ago, when writing about a public European Army, security analyst Brooks Tiggers will be affiliated in rich Scandinavian countries. Can you dream of controlling
Is the second potential version. Instead of resolving the existing national armed forces, an additional 28 army – European sailors, intervention forces involving European countries – can be created. Such units are already present.
Since 2007, the European Union has multinational compat groups of 1,500 people, but they never arrange. “Problems associated with political will-related problems, their use and financial aid to their distribution,” says the official message.
The European Union should be able to protect its area. With the help of Americans, without them. If the Ukraine is a member of the European Union, we become its security guarantee (Putin will agree to the membership of the Putin Ukraine, because he does not acquire this guarantee. But now Europe is far far from it.
