Published
Updated
Reading Time: 2 minutes – video: 3 minutes
3m
The broadcast of television trials raise questions about the entry of justice. Some see this as a way of bringing close to an ambiguous institution, others condemn a wochery.
Can we assume the scoric trial in Joe ë on the small screen? You can see the film experiments in Belgium in Belgium. The audience led by the actual magistrates in the best hearing is shown in the program “Face Judge”.
Along with our neighbors, it is the President of the Judge and the Court to the introduction of the cameras in a courtroom. The magistrate was interviewed, this project is above an act of all transparency. He will declare that he will declare that the progress of the hearing will help him draw the legal world citizens.
Exposing the hearing makes justice more accessible, and others express reservations. A lawyer gives a difference between the spread of a test and anyone who can comment on and to comment, and it raises moral concerns.
The spread of experimentation is controversial, especially because especially due to use in social networks. The extracts depicted by videographs that attract thousands of spectators. This phenomenon is described in the question is more voyriz than descriptions.
The “judge is facing the” Judge, Julie Denai, is underlined by education and pedagogue around the actions and the pedagogue. She explains that the eligibility program specifies the decisions of judges and Margon.
In contrast, in France, the chances of depicting trials, but in more strict situations. It is necessary to wait for any calls and accept the agreement of the Ministry of Justice before accepting a capture.
