Andhra Pradesh cannot be ordered to ban non -Indus from temple shop auction: Supreme Court

The Court The High Court has already retained a verdict and the 2015 order issued by the Andhra Pradesh government cannot be implemented, with non -Hindu vendors participating in the lease auction. Direct frame Report.

The bench of Justices Abhay Oka and Justice Ujjal Puayan issued a petition when a petition was dismissed against a soft process that implemented a government order in the state.

Since November 9, 2015, the government order was confirmed by the Andhra High Court in September 2019, arguing that the Constitution had violated the 14 and 15 articles of the Constitution and dismissed writ petitions against it.

In 2003, Andhra Pradesh’s charity and Hindu religious institutions and agricultural lands, other than leasing and licensing rules, changed Rule 4 (2) (K) and Rule 18 in 2015 Direct frame Report. It prohibits participation in auction or leasing within the temple attributes.

Section 14 says that all people must obtain equal and equal protection before the law, which prohibits discrimination based on religion, race, caste, gender or birth.

On January 27, 2020, the Supreme Court passed an interim order that retained the decision of the Supreme Court.

At a hearing on Wednesday, the consultant representing the state government said that the tenders filed in the petition were misrepresented and later withdrawn. Direct frame Report.

The local temple administration has been advised to advise the local temple administration to prevent similar incidents in the future.

However, the consultant for the petitioner said that the government had continued to include such subtitles in the tenders, citing the technology that the government did not rely on the government order.

Later, the state sought guarantee that he would not implement a government order, Direct frame Report. Responding to this, the state government’s advisor said there was no “question” in violation of staying.

Bench issued a clarification that the government order would not be implemented as it was staying in the High Court ruling.

The Supreme Court listed a special leave petition against the High Court order on March 4.