[ad_1]
Daniel Coffee: Cases may be long and expensive, but if AI companies use their intellectual property, the media has no choice but to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f73fb/f73fbdc6ef073a992efbd571a14a3a8b2a986190" alt="Artificial intelligence can help our customers better, but Daniel writes only if it respects intellectual property."
Article content
The US economy is built Intellectual property. Patent and Trademark Office of the United States41 percent of the GDP of the United StatesComes from IP-intensive businesses. From bogosters to influential people, the intellectual property empowers independent speech and promotes creative process and investment in quality works.
Advertisement 2
Article content
Article content
Article content
Artificial intelligence Companies have recognized this standard, but unfortunately, others have chosen to use the intellectual assets of others as fuel for their products. Now the Chinese AI applicationDeepseekTeaches that AI companiesHow much does it costBy using their creativity and intelligence.
The US has flourished by promoting testing and legally protecting the results, but for the past few decades, technology has changed, and new technology needs new decisions to our law.
That is why Thursday, for the first time, A different group of news and press members News/Media Alliance came togetherTo sue AI CompanyWe believe Violation of Copyright Protection It trains its model and spit answers to its users.
Plaintiffs Advance Local Media, Conte Nest, The Atlantic, Forbes Media, The Guardian, Business Insider, The Los Angeles Times, McClachchi Media Co. And Vox Media.
Article content
Advertisement 3
Article content
TheSuite Coer Inc.We accuse the fastest growing AI company to throw content and even try to hide the fact that it offers free – And vocabulary – For users.
Kohr has achieved an assessmentMore than $ 5 billionBy violation of the trademark of massive, formal copyright and media content. The Canadian company reveals the evidence that its own receipts offer. “In the feature”Underneath.
Koer users will break the rhetoric, complete alternative wrinkles and news reports. Thursday accuses thousands of examples of complaints violations.
There is nothing subtle about the many actions of what we believe that theft. The case details are raising the vocabulary articles and posting a story within an hour of publishing. For example, when asked for a particular October 2024 article in La Times, Kohr presentedEntire article vocabularyOnly with small words and punctuation changes.
Advertisement 4
Article content
When asked about financial strains in the public transport system in Miami-Dad County, Koer Miami presented a complete article from Herald, only a small change in the first sentence. In another line, Koer was asked to deliver the text of the Forbes article – it was finished with the Forerus’s Pilein.
Cases may be long and expensive, but we have no choice. We have tried everything for many years-digitally booking or specifying that our contents and scrapers are unlimited, renewing our service regulations, working directly with technical companies, they insist on reimbursement of our content used to get a little refund.
Nevertheless, the great benefit has gone to AI companies, and we have left a portion of our own content in the media business.
This case corresponds to the bold examples of the New York Times, whichOpenoy Inc. and Microsoft Corp.Unauthorized application of its articles on creating AI Products and News CorporationBlames the same thing against the confused AI.
Advertisement 5
Article content
This is not an attempt to turn the AI anti -case or clock. We like technology. We use it in our businesses. Artificial intelligence can help our customers better, but only if it respects intellectual property. That is the solution we are looking for in court.
Recommended from the editorial
When this applies to them, AI companies emphasize our similar claims.Meta’s case is accused of bright dataScraping data in violation of its use rules. And Sam AltmanOparion has complained that Deepseek has been illegally copying its instructions.
Good actors, responsible technologies and potential laws provide some confidence in improving the situation. But urgent need every market is needed: strengthening legal protection against theft.
Daniel is the Chairman and CEO of CoffeeNews/Media AllianceIt refers to 2,000 news and press media worldwide.
Bookmark our website and support our magazine: Don’t miss the business messages you need to know – add FinancePost.com Register for your bookmarks and our newsletters Here.
Article content
[ad_2]
Source link