According to a study | A few species in danger are better today than 20 years ago

“If we eliminate the cause of the fall of the population, it will be healed. Surprisingly, some of the results have been received,” he said and other researchers recently published in the newspaper. Features.

The study shows that at the beginning of the Canadian species for the evaluation and protection of organisms, a few species that are in danger of more than two or three decades are better today.

The organization includes an independent group formed to advise the federal government in the late 1970s, as well as the law on the first -accepted species in 2002.

However, the document suggested that the threats to wild creatures in Canada had changed slightly, especially the loss and degradation of the habitat.

The study published in January was dual analysis. Researchers began to explore the paths of 36 species that refer to the first classification groups of Kosback estimated.

They found that the risk of destruction was diminished only for these eight creatures with the past, and that the “only significant difference” between the best creatures, and that their main reason for those who do it have stopped.

Historically, some organisms faced single threats such as the DDD pesticide, which is now forbidden, which poisons pilgrims and pilgrimage and pushes the edge of the destruction, or emit the excessive explanation of the ocean otters.

These two species are the best today.

“When we manage to identify the problem, when the most targeting measures are taken to fix it, we get good results,” Mr.^I Shiller, who plays a Postacterol Research Scholarship from Carleton and Dalhezi Universities.

The path to recovery is very difficult for organisms to fight for the loss of habitats and degradation due to industrialization and other types of development.

Adequate measures

St. Lawrence is one of those creatures that are so bad today, M^I Shiller said that when he was a child, he was “falling in love with the Belukas” and that he visited the aquarium of Vancouver, and that the species prompted to become a marine biologist.

“Whales live in the St. Lawrence estate, one of the most popular maritime traffic regions in North America. They are bombed by noise pollution and chemical pollution in the region,” he says.

M^I The judges are “better” that the preservation of the protected area for Shiller whales and the most recent steps, such as seasonal speed limitations for ships.

He said about Marine Park, created in 1998, “this is more than many creatures.”

But the Pelukas are now pursuing a high risk of destruction because the existing activities cannot adjust the degradation of the habitat in the appearance of their fall.

“I see things on human basis. If one has a dangerous disease, you give them a healthy diet and lifestyle and free yoga sessions, all of this is the best, and they will help them to prolong their lives, but it will not allow him to treat him. ”^I Shiller.

The Canadian economy depends strongly, which occupies the habitat of the wild species, and these obstacles are clear in government decisions that are linked to the safety of dangerous organisms.

Three decades ago, Canada’s species rescue documents “emphasized the development of the development projects, despite the creation of short -term economic benefits, but emphasized that the stable economy needs a healthy environment”.

According to m^I Although the Shiller, the Canadian government has committed duties to fight climate change and biodiversity, “evidence that we have shown that it is unfortunate at present.”

In addition to the 36 “Centinal” species, the species evaluated at least twice and twice a year between 2000 and 2019.

Researchers have found that only 1.9 %of 422 or eight species experienced both the decline in the risk of growth and destruction in their population.

“This is the lowest number of time, efforts and money dedicated to security in Canada,” he said.^I Shiller about recovery species.

In both analyzes, the disappearance of the main cause of the decline in the fact that the condition of a species is improving or degrading.