Wilson’s BLADE 98 A RF 01 They are popular with medium to advanced recreational tennis players because of their excellent power, rotation and control.
Wilson developed RF 01 in cooperation with Roger Federer while Blade 98 is approved by several different best ATP/WTA players including Stefanos Tsitsipas., ‘ Aryna Sabalenkaand Emma Raducan.
Below I will look at the rocket specifications of both missiles to see how they compare each other.
Wilson RF 01 vs Blade 98 Comparison
I used V9 of the V9 z to compare the rocket specifications below Blade 98 and v1 z RF 01.
Comparison of rocket specifications
| Specifications: | RF 01 | Blade 98 |
|---|---|---|
| Version: | V1 | V9 |
| Design: |  |
 |
| Head size: | 98in | 98in |
| Length: | 27in | 27in |
| Tied weight: | 337g (11.9oz) | 323g (11.4oz) |
| Swingweight: | 331 | 324 |
| Balance: | 6 points hl | 4 points hl |
| Stiffness: | 67 | 62 |
| Power: | Low | Low |
| Beam width: | 23.2 mm / 23 mm / 22 mm | 21.0 mm |
| Composition: | Carbon +carbon | Graphite |
| Colors: | Black | Green |
| Sample pattern: | 16 x 19 | 16 x 19 |
| Type of grip: | Leather grip | Performance Wilson Pro |
The length and size of the head
Both missiles have a standard length 27 inches aa Head size 98 square inchesThey make them versatile opportunities for players looking for a balance between impact and maneuverability.
This combination of the length of the rocket and the size of the head makes both missiles suitable for a wide range of playing styles, from an aggressive basic game to the strategy of all courts.
To balance
Rf 01 (6 points hl) is more of the head of the head than the blade 98 (4 points hl) This will prefer players One hand backhandAs generally speaking, a tennis racket lit by a head offers greater maneuverability and control.
Wavy weight
The one RF 01 is heavier in terms of swinging and extended weight compared to Blade 98With a heavier tennis racket that offers more increased energy, stability and plow passage.
Rating
Blade 98 (62) has a lower stiffness rating than RF 01 (67(
Beam width
Both missiles have relatively thin beam widths (23.2 mm / 23 mm / 22 mm vs 21.mm) Both offer improved control, feeling and flexibility.
Power
Both of these tennis missiles are low -powered but RF 01 It would provide slightly more power because it has a thicker beam width and a heavier width/swinging weight.
But it will be better to go with Babolat Pure Drive or Wilson Clash 100 If you are looking for a frame to help you generate energy.
Pattern
Both of these tennis missiles have 16 x 19 String pattern So they will be good for players looking for a frame that offers a good generation of rotation.
The proposal
I am not a big fan of the version of the version of the version of the Blade 98 V9 and V8, because I very much preferred the design of the V7 blades.
In my opinion, RF 01 boasts more sophisticated design and is visually more attractive.
Where to buy?
Both of these frameworks are available to buy in online stores such as Tennis warehouseand Tennis point.
Player’s recommendations
If you are a beginner for the middle tennis player, I would not recommend either of these two tennis missiles because they are too low, with relatively small sweet spots.
If you are more advanced tennis players, these missiles will be more suitable for you because they offer a lot of control and a decent amount of rotation.
As for the different styles of playing, Rf 01 and Blade 98 It will suit players with a nationwide game
