[ad_1]
Whether you are a tennis player or a tennis coach, if most of your training time is spent beating balls from the basket or hand feed, you may need to reconsider your strategy.
Before I dive into this argument, let’s go on the podium. Basically, there are 2 types of practical balls that a player can receive. And Live ball aa Dead ball.
Live ball
“Live ball” is a ball that is in the game – ie is part of the exchange between two players (or 4, when talking about doubles). Playing a tennis match is an example (and the most right form) of the “live ball” environment. Other live ball drills may include a simple change of crosses between two players or a rally, which starts from the base line.
Dead ball
Below is the definition of Wayne Elderton’s definition of the dead ball channel (which I really like):
Feeding “dead balls” means delivering balls to the player (from the basket, etc.). This type of feeding provides a lot of repetition, but comes with the possibility of production “without the brain”. Players know how to pull, but not to play because they learn how to do technique without knowing what they should do about it.
A good way to imagine it is to imagine a A practical court that corresponds to the continu to court.
The tennis match would be at one end of the continuum and can be classified as the most realistic form of “living balls” training. At the very opposite end of the continuum (the least realistic end), we could have a drop – in other words, where you simply throw the ball in front of you and hit.
Here is a more detailed view of what this continuum might look like:
The least realistic for the most realistic
-
Feeding
-
Hand
-
Feeding the rocket
-
Stationary strikes (eg: Crosscourt – See Vid below)
-
Predictable motion strikes (ex: 1 cross 1 line)
-
Unpredictable intervening of W movement (e.g.
-
Semi -operative point game (eg.
-
Non-operative Body-Play (Ex: Practice Sets + Makes)
Now I’m not saying that the use of dead ball feed is not beneficial, it can certainly be. And when I get the position offered by further repetitions, I say that many of these repetitions can also be practiced by a living ball.
Below is an example of a player who practices the shoulder/rocket preparation (which many will call and unit). I believe that practicing your “preparation” during live ball replacement is more beneficial, because preparation is all about timing + rhythm.
Each ball will be affected from a slightly different position, with a more -less shape and more movement and so on. Picking up these impulses from the environment leads to the correct timing of various events – for example, an ideal moment to start the preparatory phase of the ground floor.
Why do we treat all the strokes as it serves?
The only blow in tennis, which is carried out to a larger extent in a closed format, is service. The server has control of the throw, strike and goal they want to intervene.
Impact serves from the trash – I confirm – is mainly Well, because it is specific (ie as you will still serve in the match settings). But when serving from the trash – and on the targets – can be more realistic than receiving the dead channel of the ball, it is still not as realistic as hitting it serves with a return on the other side of the network.
In no way does it seem strange that we treat all the strokes in tennis the same way it serves? All other shots in tennis occur in open format. Recall that open skill is where the environment is unpredictable.
When playing a tennis point we do not know which direction our opponent will hit the ball. We could have an idea based on experience – and knowledge of the patterns of the game that come with this experience – but even if we feel where our opponent will play a shot, we don’t know how much speed the ball will be, how much rotation or how the ball will respond when will bounce off the court.
My last point
I personally trained elite players and I was also a member of the team for professionals. Since in these environments you will quickly learn that very few dead ball feeds are happening in a large diagram of things.
I once asked Marc Polmans – ATP Tour Player – how much feeding of the basket is involved in his practices. His answer was about 5-10% of his total time to practice.
Nevertheless, I still see the practices that show the opposite, 90% of the total time to practice, which were spent beating from dead feed!
There is this idea that you will not improve your technique if you don’t have someone to feed the ball from the basket. I cannot disagree more. In more than 15 years I have not hit the ball with dead feed and my tennis has improved significantly in this period.
Recall that the base is a technique of tactics. This means that if you do not intervene with a tactical result – even during the exchange of cross -flow – the training will not pass very well when you need it most … during matches!
I want to repeat – feeding hands and rockets can be useful. However, they should be used as a tool as the main bread and butter of tennis practice.
Again, if you want to be better in tennis – and not just better at strokes – review your approach to practice. You won’t be disappointed.
Did you like this post? I have a new source to dive deep into a live ball training (including hundreds of exercises + games). Sign up and get more information + details about the release date.
Thank you!
[ad_2]
Source link
