Chelsea's Potential Mudryk Repeat with Shockingly Low-Priced Striker

As the January transfer window approaches, Chelsea and Arsenal find themselves in a fierce competition to secure the services of Brentford’s prolific striker, Ivan Toney. This rivalry bears a striking resemblance to the battle that led Chelsea to acquire Mykhailo Mudryk from Shakhtar Donetsk.

Mudryk, the Ukrainian international, has recently started to make his mark in the Premier League, even scoring against Arsenal in a recent derby match. However, his €70 million price tag upfront remains a point of contention, with some questioning whether he truly justifies the investment.

Despite being young with room to grow, nearly a year into his Stamford Bridge journey, Mudryk’s potential overpayment looms large. Chelsea may be on the cusp of repeating a similar mistake with Toney.

Chelsea’s dire need for a goal-scorer is evident. While Mauricio Pochettino has touted Nicolas Jackson as a potential Premier League sensation, the Villarreal forward’s lackluster form at the start of the season has raised concerns.

After nine matches, Chelsea has managed just 13 goals, an improvement over last season but still an average performance.

Naturally, a new centre-forward is on their agenda and Toney is a player they are interested in capturing. But they should not do so at all costs.

Fabrizio Romano has revealed that Brentford are willing to sell the 27-year-old forward for a fee just short of €75 million (£65m), which The Sun has described as being “shockingly low”.

This figure, though, is only low in comparison to the €90m that Toney was previously being listed for.

Why Chelsea shouldn’t spend big on Toney

Chelsea has compelling reasons to exercise caution before succumbing to Brentford’s steep demands for Ivan Toney.

First and foremost, Toney will approach his 28th birthday by the upcoming January transfer window, signaling his proximity to the latter stages of his prime playing years.

This not only implies a potential decline in his on-field performance but also raises concerns about his resale value. Chelsea, like other clubs, must closely monitor Financial Fair Play regulations in the coming 18 months, making a significant investment in a player with limited sell-on potential a questionable move.

While Chelsea could benefit from added experience, Toney’s age doesn’t necessarily fulfill this requirement. Despite his years, he possesses just two seasons of Premier League experience.

Although his goal-scoring record during this time is noteworthy, he has yet to feature prominently for a club of Chelsea’s stature as a regular starter.

Another crucial factor to consider is Chelsea’s urgency for a player who can seamlessly integrate into the team and make an instant impact.

Unfortunately, Ivan Toney may not fulfill this requirement, having been sidelined for eight months due to a late-season betting ban. While he may be physically fit, he won’t be match-fit, potentially impeding his ability to hit the ground running.

Taking all these aspects into account, along with the mere 18 months remaining on Toney’s Brentford contract, the previously described “shockingly low” price tag should be viewed as a substantial investment.

Chelsea’s past experience with the hasty acquisition of players like Mudryk highlights the importance of avoiding hasty decisions and ensuring thorough evaluation.


Leave a Comment