[ad_1]
Real Madrid’s allegations against Spanish referees have not been dated since yesterday. In recent seasons, Madrid Club criticizes the results of unfavorable arbitration for its team every week via its priority communications channel Real Madrid TV. But real anger and anger have reached its climax in recent weeks. There Carlos Romero’s specification during Spanish-Realin . He condemned and condemned the sent letter of a four -sided fire to the RFFF and High Sports Council (CSD) ” An old and corrupt arbitration system “, In” The way of errors and repetitive acting is used as a mechanism that causes real adverseness and “demands full reform of the arbitration system ».
The White House was then In Madrid Derby, angry at the fine paid against him . On Saturday, Edwardo Kamavanta’s ban on Kamavanta, he multiplied the anger of Mergeng, while the Osasuna striker had already fired, and the actions of the ball out of the three controversial area and the “War fines”, the Real Madrid, on Saturday, was not reported on Saturday. To the The referee is a problemCarlo warned Anselott yesterday. In our last three games, there are incredible things, and the wer saw what happened on our surface, but not in the other. There were at least three actions, and they had to be viewed, he did not do it. They had to light the VAR later. »
How are the real attitude and actions in Spain?
Spanish Football Systems – La Liga’s president Javier Debaz, mind – and most professional clubs stand against Real Madrid and his “proper victim’s posture” methods. They are particularly criticized for playing him together, and after all, thanks to its media power, thanks to the high pressure on the referees. For the sole purpose of disrupting them and affecting their judgment and their decisions, to make them more positive when they whistle. In the same way of anchoring in collective imagination, especially the most modest clubs, especially the most modest clubs, believe that Real has always been beneficial by the referee for many years. However, when many seasons have been introduced, especially when the Var (2018) has been introduced, the questions and evidence of strong controversies in Liga are not a weekend.
All clubs offer transparency and lack of persistence in particular, where similar actions can be explained and are completely different from one competition and permitted to another action. With a var, the end acts according to the praise of the referees. As before. They are unanimous that the arbitration system fails, like the size of the referees. If they all had real rebellion, the anger of the Madrid club against the mediation was at least qualified to move the lines. With a crisis gathering at RFF on 6th February, Liga leaders, Technical Technology Group (CDA) and all professional clubs – except real – and “led to the desire to change the structure of the arbitration system”.
How can the referees be appointed, which can be formed?
It will be an element of the RFEF, the referee, every Monday, central referees, touch and wire room, next weekend. More specifically, three officers will return to the final decision: the former arbitration and leader of the CDA, Louis Medina Cantalezo, elected by RFEF; A former writer appointed by Liga and a former writer selected by CSD. Their choice is particularly commanded by the form of referees, their recent services and their experience during previous meetings.
The CDA is responsible for evaluating them, allowing them, and determining the ascending and descent of the sections of the latter. The VAR referee of the Central Arbitration and the Espanyol-Real Madrid Tournament did not exclude Romero, who was convicted of a dangerous mistake on Embappe, so he was suspended until the CDA’s further announcement. The Spanish arbitration system must soon be formed, facing the transparent and repeated errors of the referees in the Liga terrain and the preferences of RFF, Liga and professional clubs.
[ad_2]
Source link
