According to the Rhinland-Palatinte CDU parliamentary committee against the prime minister Alexander Switzer The state government has issued publications under the debate (SPD). The State Chancellor announced it. The case is about the need for neutrality.
The state government wants to say, “There is no lesson in clarity and emergency practice in a comprehensive key measures.” A spokesman for the Constitutional Court announced that a spokesman for the Constitutional Court had followed the deadline for a report until 2 pm. Now there is time for a statement from the CDU Parliamentary Committee. A decision can be made in emergency practice.
This is about reports in the migration debate
The CDU parliamentary group filed a lawsuit against Switzer for violating the need for neutral demand. The Opposition Parliamentary Committee has said that Switzer intervene in the opposition committee around the State Government’s newsletter about the state government’s newsletter, the state government’s home page and the social media output in the state government.
The state government criticized the fact that the CDU parliamentary committee had initially did not seek direct connection before the case. He wrote, “A Prime Minister’s commitment to stand up and stand for him for free democratic basic order,” he wrote. “This is a publicly bitter debate about the handling of right -wing extremism and handling the right -wing population.”
With the urgent practice, the CDU wanted to achieve the removal of the parliamentary committee. Violation of neutral demand can be determined in a key practice.
© DPA-Infocom, DPA: 250212-930-373068/1
