Sandra Naidu died in January 2016 after a short disease.
In the context of his mother, a woman to claim the insurance from Life Insurance to the Life Insurance was disappointed.
The financial service team was taken to discover by discovery after the financial service was refused to close the policy.
However, the HC in favor of Kwasulu-Natal (KZN), quoting the wrong representation in the application process.
Mother takes Life Insurance Policy with finding
Sandra died in January 2016 after a short disease.
In August 2015, the Chakkwar applied to a life insurance policy with an employee for the death of Chakkkers in a shoperia.
However, when Sandra’s real gross salary was discovered as close to the Clay in May 2016, Sandra’s real gross salary was discovered to be near the R5 500.
The company had misled his income misinterpreted and the company had begun to say that they were applied for one for two other insurance policies.
Read this: Think twice before you change your life insurance
The discovery specified, which is evident, which is invalid due to misconceptions, which is invalid because the policy is invalid.
The insurer knows that the insurer knows about real facts, it would have been exposed to or refused to issue policy to issue the policy.
However, the Naidoo argued that at that time, the Naidu argued that at that time, the Naidu argued that it had extra income of “other sources”, which is better than her pay from Shoprin.
They argued that his mother had not broken the contract and finding it to provide R6 million policy.
Court testimony
During the court proceedings, the salary of Santa’s salary is a home p.
They were a full-time employee who works as 40 hours in a week, according to documents.
Namara claimed to get the income from mother’s income from mother’s earnings and distinctive workware and commission as a sales agent.
However, they tested that there were no evidence that Sandra ever registered a sales representative.
Heard more evidence
The legal counsel that the old Mutual Legal Adviser Pelen is also witnessed and revealed that the old mutual policy of the same day was accepted.
In that app, she claimed she was a shoprate supervisor income r770 000.
They have not revealed that the old reciprocates were applied for policies with other insurers.
Despite this, the claims were closed in the death of the old mutual Nedoay Sandra.
R3 million deaths of deaths, R3.3 million strands, r3 million is r3 million in the policies.
Read more: 10 questions to ask before taking a life insurance policy
Moonsmi said that Sandra’s policy was investigated as part of the investigation of the inquiry, who suspected that their income is disbursed to be disbursements.
Finded the discovery found found as a “Cower Account” to Funs Funds to Fund Funds.
The Moton argued that there is no record of Santaa’s account from a distinctive workplace in monthly payments.
Kisan High Court verdict
In a recent decree, Judge Mahendra CHeti pointed out that in order to support his claims.
The Naidu has been highlighted to court that the mother’s finance was limited to the court.
I am satisfied with the checkers of the deeds of the evidence and documentary evidence, especially when the bank statements of the dead were confirmed.
Other other income sources for allegedly. The argu had the opportunity to call witnesses, but he did not do so, he said.
Read more: How to make sure your future life insurance claim is closed
Although Sandra suspected “Paesmaker Cindicate”, the judge has accepted no direct evidence that direct evidence of his involvement.
“The bird of the financial transactions of the financial transactions, which include Sandra Nadu, casts a cloud of suspicion in her matters.
By her account, through her account, through her account, through her account, through her account, through her account, to her account, to her account.
“According to any incident, Mutlan is the subject of a criminal inquiry, in some years, finalizes in view,” Judgment Reading more.
Life Insurance Policy Case Case wins
Ultimately, Sanda was shot her income misrepresented and led the cost of the NAIs.
As a result, I am satisfied that the plaintiff failed to prove the case.
“The first accused should be eliminated to the contract, the material representation and revelation, refusing to give the death penalty for the beneficiaries, which was nominated.
Read now: faith is very important when life insurance is
