Competitive appeal The court has agreed to hear the arguments against the contesting Tribunal decision to prevent 30-40% of the fiber operator in the fiber operator.
Although the decision to prevent multibillon-rand deal, although the tribunal still provided detailed reasons.
For the reasons forbidden the merger, the parties still want to progress to the fact that the parties have not yet received and planned.
The parties to the deal were expanded for the modernization of the transaction and said that Friday will admit that again – from April 30 to April 30 this year.
The delay in delivery in the new fiber infrastructure, which has been deposited in the new fiber infrastructure, and where the parties are aligned in the new fiber infrastructure, and see the rest and see “approach.
Speaking to Tech Innetal at a time Rescaro Results in the last September This could have gone to fiber deployment. Dulwant described as a “” not only the cost of an opportunity but “.
Juvation
The complexity of the Vodecom-Macivit transaction is considered as a reason for the first time in January – the process was first declared – for about three years – the same reason for the delay in setting the reasons for the delay.
“Separate the general competition, such as the Vodacom-Maciv transaction, and the merger of the public interest problems.
Read: Great Twist in Vodest, Muscu Layer Saga
The trade, industry and competitive retirement of trade, industry and competitive man should apply for the tribunal of the contract, compared to South Africa’s competitive regulators.
The tauries of the tribunal were supported by the tauries of the tribunal and supported. In order for the growth of the Mobile Connectivity and Mobile Connectivity, Mobile Connectivity and Mobile Connectivity, and mobile connectivity, and mobile connectivity, and mobile connectivity, and mobile connectivity, and mobile connectivity, and mobile connectivity, and mobile connectivity. – © 2025 Newsenetral Media
Get substances from Texentral in the Whatsapp. Sign up here
Don’t miss:
The competition tribunal Maciv and the cell Celson defends delays
